We look forward to Ivan Kreilkamp’s conversation with the UI Next Gen PhD planners on Tuesday, November 1, at 3:30 (BCSB 101), part of a series of symposia organized around rhetorical forms. In our grant proposal, we described this event as follows:
Symposium 3: The Tweet The speed of Twitter communication presents an opportunity and a challenge. As they compose 140-character missives, tweeters can try out different identities, throw out fishing lines, and sharpen lures. On the other hand, an ill-considered comment can have an alarming permanence as it rockets across the Twitter-verse. This symposium will attend to how graduate students can craft professional personae online, with particular attention to voice and tone. The symposium will consider how the same rhetorical skills that allow Twitter-users to disseminate scholarship can be marshaled in careers beyond the academy.
We’re especially interested in talking to Dr. Kreilkamp about how he has come to write for both scholarly and popular venues, and about how his Twitter persona has evolved. To sample Ivan Kreilkamp’s writing in advance of the symposium, check out his essay “Against ‘Against [X]’” in the New Yorker, or his Twitter handle @IvanKreilkamp. Listed below are the questions we’re poised to ask him on November 1. Feel free to add more in the comments section.
Will you talk a little about how you made the transition from writing for scholarly venues to writing for magazines like the New Yorker, Village Voice, or Public Books?
Are there ways in which you (or others at your home institution) are helping PhD candidates develop skills that will serve them in careers beyond the academy?
What advice do you have for graduate students who want to cultivate a Twitter presence?
Are there aspects of voice curation on Twitter that you think are especially important for graduate students?
Do you encourage your graduate students to develop an online presence?
Are there Twitter mistakes of which graduate students need to be especially cognizant? How does one rebound from a Twitter mishap?
Who maintains the Twitter presence of Victorian Studies (@VictStudies), the journal which you edit?
How, or to what extent, is it possible to use Twitter to advance a research program?
What are the potential positive and negative effects on scholarly production of an active Twitter presence?
How much time do you think a graduate student should spend on curating an intellectual presence online?
Do you recommend that graduate students follow certain communities online? In your field, are there “must-follow” online entities? What are they?
To what extent does Twitter help you keep up with your field?
How do you feel about the live-tweeting of conference papers?
What would you say to skeptics who think that Twitter is about self-promotion and little else?
What is the shelf life of a tweet? Do you anticipate a future in which tweets get cited in scholarly articles?